article

· · to read
[RAMAGE] – How to make ChatGPT provide sources and citations

TL:DR you still need to check the sources.

This use of #ChatGPT seems to be more applicable for students having to write a paper quickly than for serious #research. Or maybe as support for literarture review, but the search time optimisation will be lost in checking the sources. An interface towards a research database, allowing an automatic check of the citations, building on tools such as the ones as developed by Simon Willison, could be an answer. An interface towards a research database, allowing an automatic check of the citations, building on tools such as the ones as developed by Simon Willison, could be an answer.

 

If you know how to properly prompt ChatGPT, it will give you sources. Here’s how.

1. Write a query and ask ChatGPT

To start, you need to ask ChatGPT something that needs sources or citations. I’ve found it’s better to ask a question with a longer answer so there’s more « meat » for ChatGPT to chew on.

Keep in mind that ChatGPT can’t provide any information after 2021 and requests about information pre-internet (say, for a paper on Ronald Reagan’s presidency) will have far fewer available sources.

Here’s an example of a prompt I wrote on a topic I worked on a lot when I was in grad school:

Describe the learning theories of cognitivism, behaviorism, and constructivism

2. Ask ChatGPT to provide sources

This is where a bit of prompt engineering comes in. A good starting point is with this query:

Please provide sources for the previous answer

I’ve found that this often provides offline sources, books, papers, etc. The problem with offline sources is you can’t check their veracity. But it’s a starting point. A better query is this:

Please provide URL sources

This specifically tells ChatGPT that you want clickable links to sources. You can also tweak this up by asking for a specific quantity of sources, although your mileage may vary in terms of how many you get back:

Please provide 10 URL sources

In our next step, we’ll see what we can do with these.

3. Attempt to verify/validate the provided sources

Keep in mind this golden rule about ChatGPT-provided sources: ChatGPT is more often wrong than right.

Across the many times I’ve asked ChatGPT for URL sources, roughly half are just plain bad links. Another 25% or more are links that go to topics completely or somewhat unrelated to the one you’re trying to source.

For example, I asked for sources on a backgrounder for the phrase « trust but verify, » generally attributed to 1980s US President Ronald Reagan. I got a lot of sources back, but most didn’t actually exist. I got some back that correctly took me to active pages on the Reagan Presidential Library site, but where the page topic had nothing to do with the phrase in question.

article

· · to read
Chat GPT et la détection homéopathique du plagiat

Dans un article récent, @Luc Ferry demande comment différencier un devoir rédigé par l’intelligence artificielle (IA) de la copie d’un « élève humain »:

Luc Ferry

A quoi reconnait-on la disserte de philo d’un élève humain de celle écrite [par] ChatGPT ? Et comment est on certain qu’il n’a pas plagié ? Les fautes d’orthographe, évidemment 🙂

Je discute ici brièvement non la remarque de Ferry – qui contrairement à plusieurs de ses commentateurs, ne semble pas réaliser que l’on peut prompter ChatGPT pour, par exemple, introduire des solécismes – mais la proposition d’une de ses lectrices pour déceler le recours à l’IA.

Continue reading →

article

· · to read
Assemblée générale 2023 de l’ASHSM

L’association suisse d’histoire et de sciences militaires (ASHSM) tenait son assemblée générale annuelle le 12 mai 2023 dans les locaux de la bibliothèque am Guisanplatz (BiG). La partie officielle, rondement menée, a montré la bonne santé financière de la société ainsi que l’abondance des activités. Elle a été suivie du vernissage du dernier livre de l’ASHSM, le volume 6 de la collection ARES intitulé Autres sources pour l’histoire militaire suisse.

L’après-midi, le Dr Philippe Müller a expliqué la stratégie digitale de la BiG, avant que les participantes et les participants ne visitent la bibliothèque et ses collections patrimoniales.

checkin

· · to read

Invité à l’inauguration de RUAG Innovation à Lausanne, dans le cadre d’un événement organisé en collaboration avec Unlimitrust by #SICPA, #Swissintell et #Trust Valley.

Passionnantes conférences sur les défis de la géopolitique – Jean-Philippe Gaudin (SICPA, ancien directeur SRC), les LLM – Prof. Philippe Cudré-Mauroux (eXascale Infolab, UNIFR), la vision de la Suisse comme Deeptech Nation – Dominique Mégret (Swisscom Ventures).

quote
· · to read

Speed of Sound (songs at the link) was much derided upon its release in 1976, and more recently one scathing reviewer gave it a “1” score out of 10.  Yet I find this an entertaining and also compelling work.  At least Eoghan Lyng had the sense to call it “definitely infectious and decidedly hummable.”  But it’s better than that, and I would stress the following:

1. The album very definitely has its own “sound.”  Super clean production, a limpid clarity in the mix, and sparing deployment of guitar.  Not all of that works all the time, but there is a coherence to a production often described as a mish-mash.  The sound of the whole is best reflected by “The Note You Never Wrote,” a McCartney song sung by Denny Laine, placed wisely in the number two slot.  Nothing on either the disc or the original album sounds compressed, rather it all comes to life.  It’s better than the sluggish, overproduced, horn-heavy Venus and Mars.

2. The unapologetic presentation has held up fine, rejecting its own era of albums that were overloaded with ideas, overproduced, and too self-consciously parading their messages.  Speed of Sound is so deliberately unhip you can hardly believe it — who else in 1976 would pay tribute to “Phil and Don” of the Everly Brothers?  And Paul was thanking MLK (“Martin Luther”) when others were still flirting with the Black Panthers.  Surely he was right that “Silly Love Songs” would persist, so maybe people were hating on how on the mark he was.

[3]. At exactly the same time Wings was evolving into one of the very best live acts of the 1970s, far better than the Beatles ever were.  (Yes, I know it is hard to admit that.)  Their live act sizzled, and yes I did see it back then and I have listened to it many times since.  Check out the YouTube channel of jimmymccullochfan, for instance “Beware My Love” or “Soily,” or how about “Call Me Back Again“?  For Macca, Wings at this time was essentially a live band, and it proved to be his greatest live band achievement of all time (with some competition from his early 1990s shows), most of all pinned down by Jimmy McCulloch on guitar and Paul on bass.

quote

· · to read

James Sanders @jas_np@mastodon.social

Somewhere, I think there’s an engineer who is really good at meeting deadlines, now angrily shaking their fist at society because a bunch of people playing with LLMs are calling themselves “prompt engineers” and just like that, all of their personal branding has evaporated.

Apr 29, 2023, 06:48 · · Mastodon for iOS · 1 · 4

quote

· · to read

Michał « rysiek » Woźniak


27.04.2023

Almost exactly six months after Twitter got taken over by a petulant edge lord, people seem to be done with grieving the communities this disrupted and connections they lost, and are ready, eager even, to jump head-first into another toxic relationship. This time with BlueSky.

BlueSky’s faux-decentralization

BlueSky differentiates itself from Hive, Post, and other centralized social media newcommers by being ostensibly decentralized. It differentiates itself from the Fediverse by not being the Fediverse, and by being funded by *checks notes* Twitter. Oh, and by being built by Silicon Valley techbros, instead of weirdos who understand consent and how important moderation is.

quote

· · to read

28 April 2023 12h00 – 14h00

Zwischen Militär, Journalismus und Politik
Internationale Perspektiven
Bruno Lezzi – Autorenlesung
The conference is held in German and is exclusively on-site at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy.

  • Light snacks following the event

The dramatic changes in world politics call for a renewed approach to security policy. It is difficult to find tangible solutions without knowledge of how the situation developed during the Cold War and after the strategic shift in the early 1990s.

Bruno Lezzi, a security and defence policy specialist, recalls essential milestones in this history in his latest book Von Feld zu Feld – Ein Leben zwischen Armee, Journalismus und Politik. He presents an unvarnished analysis based on his experiences as editor of the NZZ, lecturer for security policy at the University of Zurich and colonel (general staff) in the Swiss Armed Forces.

His visits to hot spots during the wars in the Balkans, Chechnya and Afghanistan have enabled him to draw concise portraits of the descriptions of these decades of tension.

quote
· · to read

You should have a personal website not because you need to grow an audience, and turn your hobbyist writing into a profession.

You should have a personal website not because you’re an expert on some subject, and it would be cruel to deny the world your wisdom.

You should have a personal website not because you think you’re important.

You should have a personal website not because the world is in need of your highlight reel.

You should have a personal website because I think the online world is as real as the offline world. You have a presence in one, and you should have a presence in the other.

quote
· · to read

 

Stock images strongly influence the ways in which non-expert audiences think about and understand the topics they illustrate. This is why it is worrying that research has repeatedly shown that many images of artificial intelligence are misleading and unhelpful.

This guide presents the results of a year-long study into alternative ways of creating images of AI, involving roundtable and workshop conversations with over 100 experts from fields including the tech sector, media, education, research, policy and the arts. Its aim is to advise people who work with images of AI – from journalists to communications officers, from educators to activists – on sourcing and creating the best images for communicating accurately and compellingly.