L’idée que la Suisse, pays neutre, dépositaire des Conventions de Genève, ait pu chercher à développer une bombe atomique, peut apparaître insolite. Et pourtant, pendant la Guerre froide, la Confédération a effectivement lancé un programme militaire secret de recherches nucléaires. La conférence met en lumière les raisons principales pour lesquelles la Suisse a cherché à s’équiper de cette arme, les motifs qui l’ont finalement incitée à signer le Traité sur la non-prolifération des armes nucléaires (TNP), puis contraste le développement suisse de l’époque avec celui, contemporain, des pays proliférants.
Christian Bühlmann (2016) « Christian Bühlmann (2016) « Guy Parmelin – Paul Chaudet: même combat? » Le Temps, vendredi 29 janvier 2016, page 9. Site Internet, 28.01.2016, Source : http://www.letemps.ch/opinions/2016/01/28/guy-parmelin-paul-chaudet-meme-combat
Christian Bühlmann (2016) « Christian Bühlmann (2016) « Guy Parmelin – Paul Chaudet: même combat? » Le Temps, vendredi 29 janvier 2016, page 9. Site Internet, 28.01.2016, Source : http://www.letemps.ch/opinions/2016/01/28/guy-parmelin-paul-chaudet-meme-combat
Pour le colonel EMG Christian Bühlmann, Guy Parmelin n’est pas un spécialiste de la sécurité et ne semble pas avoir de position arrêtée sur la politique de défense. Cette distanciation représente pour lui une chance de s’élever au-dessus des luttes intestines
Allocution prononcée à l’ouverture de l’après-midi du colloque du 12 février 2011.
Comme ancien officier supérieur adjoint du chef de l’Armée (CdA), c’est avec émotion que j’ai contribué à cet hommage à Bernard Barbey, chef d’état-major (EM) personnel du général Guisan. La similitude de l’organisation, à défaut de la proximité du contexte historique, est l’organisation, à défaut de la proximité du contexte historique, est passionnante. Le brigadier Daniel Berger, président du Centre d’histoire et de prospective militaires (CHPM), soulignait aussi, par-delà les aspects de prospective militaires (CHPM), soulignait aussi, par-delà les aspects on ne peut que l’approuver.
Nombre de problèmes éternels de notre système militaire sont en effet décrits dans les deux ouvrages militaires majeurs de Barbey, P.C. du Général et Aller et retour : ainsi, l’influence marquée de la politique sur les décisions militaires, qui dépasse, dans le niveau de détail des prescriptions, la «blosse Fortsetzung der Politik», chère à Carl von Clausewitz,’ les frictions entre les niveaux de commandement ; la difficile mise en œuvre aux bas échelons des missions ordonnées par le commandement suprême ; la nécessité incontournable d’un niveau militaire stratégique.
Allocution prononcée à l’ouverture de l’après-midi du colloque du 12 février 2011.
Comme ancien officier supérieur adjoint du chef de l’Armée (CdA), c’est avec émotion que j’ai contribué à cet hommage à Bernard Barbey, chef d’état-major (EM) personnel du général Guisan. La similitude de l’organisation, à défaut de la proximité du contexte historique, est l’organisation, à défaut de la proximité du contexte historique, est passionnante. Le brigadier Daniel Berger, président du Centre d’histoire et de prospective militaires (CHPM), soulignait aussi, par-delà les aspects de prospective militaires (CHPM), les aspects on ne peut que l’approuver.
Nombre de problèmes éternels de notre système militaire sont en effet décrits dans les deux ouvrages militaires majeurs de Barbey, P.C. du Général et Aller et retour : ainsi, l’influence marquée de la politique sur les décisions militaires, qui dépasse, dans le niveau de détail des prescriptions, la «blosse Fortsetzung der Politik», chère à Carl von Clausewitz,’ les frictions entre les niveaux de commandement ; la difficile mise en œuvre aux bas échelons des missions ordonnées par le commandement suprême ; la nécessité incontournable d’un niveau militaire stratégique.
Both parties have agreed to cooperate in a number of areas related to international peace and security as well as regional issues. They plan to collaborate on training and education, research, and dialogue activities. Their general objectives are to train diplomats and other civil servants in the field of international security, conduct mutually agreed cooperation and projects, as well as activities which will enhance the fulfillment of their respective mandates.
The GCSP has already been working closely during the last decade with the Royal Jordan National College for the organization of the Training Course in Diplomacy and Security Policy for Military Officers and Civil Servants Involved in International Relations, better known as the Defence Attaché Orientation Module. The collaboration with the Jordan Institute of Diplomacy will enhance and complement this cooperation and provide new insight on the Middle East region
The GCSP is engaged in partnerships with numerous leading international organisations, think tanks, and academic institutes to collaborate on a variety of activities aimed at providing forward-thinking and creative solutions in international affairs to individuals and institutions worldwide.
The GCSP, thanks to funding from the Swiss Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport – International Relations Defence (DDPS, IR D), conducted very successfully the “9th Defence Attaché Orientation Module, Training Course in Diplomacy and Security Policy for Military Officers and Civil Servants Involved in International Relations” in the premises of the Royal Jordanian National Defense College in Amman from 8 to 12 November 2015.
It was attended by a wide and rich range of participants from the MENA but also from further abroad. In total there were 34 participants from 16 countries: Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Egypt, Kazakhstan, , Lebanon, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Czech Republic, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine and, also, Jordan as the host country (12 participants). Moreover, 10 participants from the War Program and the National Defense Program took part to the courses on a daily basis.
This orientation module was greatly appreciated by acting and future Defence Attachés as it provided a good overview of the multitude of activities such a position entails, as well as an opportunity to exchange views and experiences.
Many speakers brought new insight to the participants, amongst them H. E. Mr Hans-Peter Lenz, Ambassador of Switzerland to Jordan, H. E. Mr Shafaat Ullah Shah, Ambassador of Pakistan to Jordan, and H. E. Mr Mohamed Taisir Bani Yassin, Secretary General, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriate, Jordan.
Lead by Colonel Urs Amiet, Senior Programme Advisor, Regional Development Programme at the GCSP, the course reached all its aims, which were:
- to develop the skills and expertise of defence officials working in a multilateral environment (such as Defence Attachés) in the various aspects of international security;
- to provide them with practical training in national and international procedures as well as other areas relevant for their future work;
- to familiarize them with the work in a multilateral and multicultural setting.
The participants underlined the excellence of the module, the quality of the content, as well as the added value of contacts with participants from the region and beyond.
Abstract
Many have noted the enigma of neo-liberalism’s
survival after 2008 (for example, Crouch, 2011;Overbeek and van
Apeldoorn, 2012;Peck, 2013).After all, ‘the market’ utterly failed
to stabilise the global financial system, and governments took over
this task applying instruments that violated every rule in the
neoliberal book and that would have been unthinkable before the
fall of 2008.
To read this article in full you may need to log in,
make a payment or gain access through a site license (see
right).…
A suivre / Follow http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ap/journal/v50/n4/full/ap201514a.html
Paragraph 1:“The operational level of war spans a continuum-from comprehensive strategic direction to concrete tactical actions.Bridging this continuum requires operational art which is creative vision coupled with broad experience and knowledge.Without the operational level of war, tactical actions devolve into a series of disconnected engagements that do not accomplish the mission or objectives of the joint force.”…
L’intuition d’un rapport entre la guerre et l’État est ancienne : « Le conflit est le père de toute chose », avance Héraclite. Cependant, sous l’influence de la culture stratégique américaine, qui considère la conflictualité comme une activité industrielle, la conduite de la guerre moderne est souvent comparée à une activité de gestion (Bühlmann 2014, Levy 2010). Mais dans les faits, les conflits ne consistent pas seulement en des processus industriels et logistiques visant à créer un effet stratégique au bon endroit, au bon moment et avec l’intensité demandée. Pour appréhender les guerres du futur dans une approche plus large, il est nécessaire de dépasser l’étude de la transformation de la guerre pour s’attacher à l’influence de la mutation des conflictualités sur la forme de l’État occidental.
Je vais tout d’abord rappeler l’approche proposée par le politiste Charles Tilly (1992), puis j’esquisserai les contours des nouveaux conflits avec un modèle générationnel et avec celui des menaces hybrides. J’analyserai alors quelques conséquences de la modification de la guerre sur celles de l’État en m’attachant à deux aspects : (1) la transformation du système de gouvernement et (2) la représentation du citoyen.
Christian Bühlmann (2015) « Les nouveaux conflits transforment-ils les États modernes ? » in swissfuture – das Magazin für Zukunftsmonitoring 02+03/15, Luzern, SwissFuture 29-32, pp. 73 – 87.
Image: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?192449-Swiss-Army-1950-1990-(old-school)&p=5418227&viewfull=1#post5418227
En Suisse, plus qu’ailleurs, l’armée n’est pas qu’un instrument de la politique de sécurité. Comme Peter Braun et al. l’affirment, elle est un « komplexes Gebilde, das durch mannigfaltige Bezüge eng mit der Gesamtgesellschaft verwachsen und verwoben ist» . Pour appréhender ce système complexe, il est nécessaire de dépasser les explications réductrices. C’est ainsi que Rudolf Jaun, Peter Braun et d’autres ont identifié la continuité, dans la longue durée, de catégories pérennes de croyances portant sur le militaire. Ces auteurs décrivent l’évolution des tensions entre deux visions du monde et leurs conséquences sur la politique de défense helvétique, pour une période allant jusqu’à la fin des années soixante : une posture réformiste et républicaine d’une part, et une posture militariste d’autre part.
« A man asks the librarian for a copy of the [Swiss] Constitution. The librarian responds, ‘I’m sorry but we don’t carry periodicals.’«
Helvetized version based on http://bcn.li/s/co4bb
To my friends abroad: This is actually a positive feature of the Swiss political system!
- Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.
- Do not think it worth while to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.
- Never try to discourage thinking for you are sure to succeed.
- When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavor to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.
- Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.
- Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.
- Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.
- Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent than in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.
- Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.
- Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool’s paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness.
http://www.brainpickings.org/2012/05/02/a-liberal-decalogue-bertrand-russell/
En préparant le programme du SPOT 2015 (SWISS MILITARY PROFESSIONAL OFFICERS TRAINING), je tombe sur une brochure sur laquelle je figure en première page.
« Gangnam style » à la gare de Gangnam.
Nearly every other social science, except history (which is a weird social science and humanities border case), has the same properties. We have ideas, we have data. Sometimes we do experiments. We collect other data. Sometimes we can replicate results. Sometimes we make progress and accumulate evidence, but other times not. This is, essentially, how science is done.
– http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/sorry-but-social-science-is-actually-a-science/
Around 120 participants from 30 countries and the United Nations, including leading policymakers, practitioners and academics, descended upon the scenic venue situated north of the Chinese capital, ready to exchange experiences, views and ideas on how to overcome obstacles, build capacities and promote the effective implementation of peace operations.
After a tour of the Peacekeeping Centre, where training programs are run for Chinese peacekeepers before deployment, the Challenges Annual Forum was opened by Senior Colonel Zhang Li, Deputy Director-General of the Peacekeeping Affairs Office of the Ministry of National Defense of China and Ms Annika Hilding Nordberg, Director of the Challenges Forum Secretariat, outlining the agenda and setting the tone for the dynamic discussions to follow: while there are many challenges of modern peace operations, they can be overcome by a committed partnership.
The thematic focus for this Annual Forum was « Building Capacity for Peace Operations in Response to Diversifies Threats: What Lies Ahead? » – a topical issue in view of the increased presence of non-traditional threats in many areas where peace operations are deployed.
The chosen theme was also very timely in relation to the upcoming review of the UN peace operations, initiated by the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last June and to be completed next year. How to enhance the tools and capabilities of the UN peace operations to more effectively meet the challenges in complex security environments will be a central theme for this review. Mr David Haeri, Director of the Policy, Evaluation and Training Division, Departments of Peacekeeping Operations and Field Support in the UN Secretariat, shared the current thinking of the United Nations on these matters.
The challenges posed by the non-traditional threats – such as terrorism, piracy, asymmetric warfare and transnational organized crime – give rise to a number of questions, not only about what strategies, capabilities and skills are needed for peacekeepers to effectively deliver on their mandates, but also how to improve the ability to better face threats directed at the peacekeepers themselves. Two of the sessions were devoted to the above set of questions. Among the issues raised was the need to make better use of modern technology and innovations and to develop strategic partnerships with regional organizations.
A third session took a closer look at the logistical requirements of conducting complex peace operations, in particular in remote areas. As the security threats increasingly take on non-traditional forms and often occur away from urban centers, in locations where the infrastructure is poor, the logistical challenges of undertaking peace operations are becoming more daunting. Also here, the question of how best to provide the right capabilities was addressed, including the need for logistics support for rapid deployment and for robust mandates.
Insightful and thought-provoking recommendations
A fourth and final session focused on the issue of partnerships for capacity-building of peacekeepers, both at international, regional and national levels. Among the recommendations put forward was the need to enhance pre-deployment training and training while deployed, to harmonize standards for training program and to promote a more interoperable training system for the peacekeepers.
The distinguished panelists offered insightful and thought-provoking presentations and recommendations, highlighting different aspects of the issues at hand. The interactive discussions in the auditorium were continued over the coffee breaks and at the dining table, the different professional and regional perspectives mixing and synergizing.
The horizons were further expanded by a visit to the Great Wall. A much appreciated tour of the Police Peacekeeping Training Centre in Lanfang was also arranged for the participants in the Challenges Annual Forum. Madam Nancy Gao, Director of the Police Peacekeeping Training Centre, and her team gave a presentation of the training program offered, including a demonstration of exercises by a Formed Police Unit training to be deployed in Liberia next year.
At the end of the Challenges Annual Forum, Major General (ret.) Huang Baifu, Vice Chairman of the China Institue of International Strategic Studies, offered concluding remarks and summarized the main points of the discussions. As pointed out by the hosting nation, the autumn is the season for harvest. Indeed, the Challenges Annual Forum in Beijing produced a rich outcome in terms of ideas, proposals and recommendations, as well as strengthened partnerships and networks among the participants. And most certainly, new seeds have been sown for later harvest in coming years.
Se rappeler les bons souvenirs et le temps passé ensemble : une manière de berner le chagrin.
Chez moi, Philippe avait installé les lustres; faire la lumière, c’est aussi penser à lui.